Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Computer Gaming / Re: DCS Discussion
« Last post by Toonces on Today at 09:31:58 PM »
Wow, that sounds pretty impressive!  Nice find.
2
Computer Gaming / Re: Star Trek Wargame
« Last post by Sir Slash on Today at 08:47:48 PM »
Here, Here! I hope there's Planet Killers in this game. Or, Giant Amebas.  :hide:
3
GrogHeads Feedback / Re: Grogheads AAR - Kiev '43
« Last post by Sir Slash on Today at 08:43:40 PM »
Yes, that was a great AAR.  O0
4
GrogHeads Feedback / Re: Grogheads AAR - Kiev '43
« Last post by JasonPratt on Today at 08:18:12 PM »
Thanks for the extra notes!  :bd:
5
Computer Gaming / Re: More Close Combat at Gog.
« Last post by JasonPratt on Today at 08:16:42 PM »
I get the appeal [of the Graviteam systems], but I much prefer the "digital ASL" experience where I get to micro my squads a bit and choose where they shoot or throw smoke or what have you.

Yep! -- and the CC series itself was originally supposed to be an official Advanced Squad Leader adaptation except in real-time. Some rights issues fell through or something.

Though personally I prefer Combat Mission and its ilk, which are much like 3D implementations of Close Combat (even down to some of the user interface designs). But there's room for both, and reasons to enjoy and gnash teeth at both.  >:D
6
Computer Gaming / Re: More Close Combat at Gog.
« Last post by JasonPratt on Today at 08:12:59 PM »
Hard to say. We really need a Groghead review of it one day.

 >:D


Re ComOps2 (and its prior family), yes it's more operational level, that's true. You aren't going to see individual units (unless something goes really wrong with a squad, which I recall being the least unit on the map. ;) ) And it's pushing counters around, whether NATOish or something more visually representative of the unit type as a flag.

Having said that: I found the gameplay, and how it relates to the maps, VERY similar to CC, with more bling in regard to setting up orders (if you want to -- or you can just tell your on-map boss to go 'here' and watch it devolve orders down the line to subunits.) It has the order-timing feature CC is missing, too, although on the other hand you can turn that off. Last year, or the year before -- a little after ComOps2 released on Steam, some enterprising super-grog ran some tests to discover that it's more efficient to micro things around rather than to delegate! Which is technically true, but only helpful if you're pausing the game all the time. If you're running it at a speed to better simulate the business of developing and passing orders (instead of being one guy with a keyboard and an occasional pause button) -- especially if you're playing mp (I expect) -- you need to delegate more. And of course it depends on how large the fight is. There's no point NOT to micro manage the ten units in the two tutorial-demo missions, for example.


Having said that: I'm sorry to report that, after buying into the game for a couple of decades through its iterations (since its 2nd gen release, Highway to the Reich) without ever really playing it, I sat down in 2019 to seriously learn the game by playing the flanking maneuver mission of Italy's botched invasion of Greece -- playing the Greek side myself -- and I learned that the system is AT LEAST as wonky in execution as Close Combat ever was.  ::) :P

It's super-impressive, don't get me wrong, and I had a blast playing it, but my immersion often blew right out the window watching the units do things that would never, ever happen in real life, when realistic command results is the big draw of the game.

To give one example, the Italian AI really should have won the match: they had managed to infiltrate practically an entire division past my scattered guards, despite my best efforts, and gotten them to the ex-fil zone. All they had to do was leave the map to win, and win HUGE. Sure, I might have thought the game was a tad gamey in the events leading up to that situation, but once I realized what happened, I could accept the result as plausible and fair.

The problem was that I discovered this a few days after the op started as some of my own reinforcement divisions started to arrive from off-map, and I realized I had some extra 'pieces' to go down and secure the ex-fil road. So I probed down there very properly, expecting to run into Italians trying to get there, not realizing the Italians had already gotten everyone there which the AI cared to send, more than enough to totally win.

And they had been sitting there in that grid. Doing nothing. For at least one game day, maybe two.

When I detected them there, I panicked, thinking dang I was just behind them and I hadn't moved fast enough (sort of true there), and now I'm going to have to watch them exit the board...! ...but nope. They sat there on a hill near the road leading off the map to victory, and died/surrendered in a glorious defense as I brought everyone I could down on them. Then I held the position, fending off a couple of sallies over the next few days. I still had about half the days to go in the op, and maybe some other things would happen, but I felt empty. (And frustrated over some other dippy things going on elsewhere that made no sense; like a motorized infantry unit deciding to go the long way around a river instead of fording it like everyone else in the group, and then getting stuck in the mud slightly off road, and refusing to abandon their trucks to slowwwwwly inch them along their original dumbass path anyway which I could never order them off of, as their usefulness withered and died over the days and nights they spent in their Sisiphean torments.)

...sigh. But yeah. We were talking about CC.  O:-)
7
Computer Gaming / Re: DCS Discussion
« Last post by Skoop on Today at 07:17:40 PM »
You guys seen this one ?

https://www.mudspike.com/dcs-liberation/

Itís a 3rd party app that runs a dynamic campaign in dcs.  Works in sp and mp.  You can see the reapers guy demo it on YouTube.

I guess the community couldnít wait for their in house dynamic campaign.
8
Computer Gaming / Re: Star Trek Wargame
« Last post by Toonces on Today at 05:47:32 PM »
I have tons of respect for anyone who can program a computer game. 

Welcome aboard, Mini!
9
Computer Gaming / Re: Rainbow Six is Dead
« Last post by Jarhead0331 on Today at 05:44:48 PM »
Ground Branch and Ready or Not have potential. Ready or Not is being built as a single-player focused experience, so I'm very hopeful that we'll get an authentic old school R6/SWAT tactical experience there.
10
Computer Gaming / Re: Star Trek Wargame
« Last post by Jarhead0331 on Today at 05:40:50 PM »
Alright guys...lets give the guy a break. It wasn't the most descriptive first post, but it looks like an interesting game.

Let's give the guy a chance.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10