Zettabytes of Data

Started by LongBlade, April 13, 2013, 09:59:57 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages1 2
User actions

LongBlade

April 13, 2013, 09:59:57 AM
This is a fairly long article. Some of you will have an allergic reaction to reading the news source but I think most will agree it's solid reporting on a relevant issue.

The NSA is building a *huge* data storage center outside of Salt Lake. They claim that it won't be used on US citizens. However, given the fact that even the IRS believes it can hack our electronics this claim should be viewed skeptically.

I'll post some excerpts to the article. However, it's worth reading the entire thing.

QuoteSome published reports suggest it could hold 5 zettabytes of data. (Just one zettabyte is the equivalent of about 62 billion stacked iPhones 5's-- that stretches past the moon.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2013/04/12/nsa-data-center-front-and-center-in-debate-over-liberty-security-and-privacy/

QuoteBecause the Utah Data Center is a "secure facility" and you cannot go inside without the needed security clearances, Fox News rented a helicopter and took to the skies, where the depth and breadth of the Utah Center were stunning.

The aerial video footage is exclusive to the Fox News investigation and posted here.  Two weeks after our filming, the helicopter pilot reported to our Fox News team that he had been visited by the FBI on a "national security matter."

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2013/04/12/nsa-data-center-front-and-center-in-debate-over-liberty-security-and-privacy/

Personally, I'd be happy with this site if I knew the 4th Amendment was being faithfully and fully followed by all US agencies.
All that is gold does not glitter,
Not all those who wander are lost;
The old that is strong does not wither,
Deep roots are not reached by the frost.

bayonetbrant

#1
April 13, 2013, 10:07:01 AM
Quote from: LongBlade on April 13, 2013, 09:59:57 AMPersonally, I'd be happy with this site if I knew the 4th Amendment was being faithfully and fully followed by all US agencies.

The key to surviving this site is to not say something which ends up as someone's tag line - Steelgrave

"their citizens (all of them counted as such) glorified their mythology of 'rights'...and lost track of their duties. No nation, so constituted, can endure." Robert Heinlein, Starship Troopers

Longdan

#2
April 13, 2013, 11:11:25 AM
Quote from: bayonetbrant on April 13, 2013, 10:07:01 AM
Quote from: LongBlade on April 13, 2013, 09:59:57 AMPersonally, I'd be happy with this site if I knew the 4th Amendment was being faithfully and fully followed by all US agencies.



Land of the Free, Home of the hopelessly deadlocked partisan politics and secret police.
digni enim sunt interdicunt

Jack Nastyface

#3
April 15, 2013, 09:59:39 PM
It's probably best to read between the lines on this one...
The bad news:  The gov't plans on storing tons of electronic data.
The good news:  They say it's only going to be used to track bad guys.
The bad news:  Pretty much everyone can be considered potentially bad until they prove themselves otherwise.
The good news:  Collecting this much data will allow gov't security agencies to quickly identify and act on legitimate threats.
The bad news:  Unless they ever have to defrag the storage array...a process which STILL doesn't support multi-threading and will therefore probably take a decade or so.
Now, the problem is, how to divide five Afghans from three mules and have two Englishmen left over.

LongBlade

#4
April 15, 2013, 10:05:01 PM
Quote from: Jack Nastyface on April 15, 2013, 09:59:39 PM
It's probably best to read between the lines on this one...

I'm not sure that's what our respective republics are supposed to be about...
All that is gold does not glitter,
Not all those who wander are lost;
The old that is strong does not wither,
Deep roots are not reached by the frost.

Mr. Bigglesworth

#5
April 15, 2013, 11:48:52 PM
All your bytes are belong to us!
"Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more; "
- Shakespeare's Henry V, Act III, 1598

bayonetbrant

#6
April 16, 2013, 06:13:22 AM
Quote from: Jack Nastyface on April 15, 2013, 09:59:39 PMThe bad news:  Pretty much everyone can be considered potentially bad until they prove themselves otherwise.

we've been over this ad nauseum before

it hasn't gotten any better
The key to surviving this site is to not say something which ends up as someone's tag line - Steelgrave

"their citizens (all of them counted as such) glorified their mythology of 'rights'...and lost track of their duties. No nation, so constituted, can endure." Robert Heinlein, Starship Troopers

LongBlade

#7
April 16, 2013, 08:12:05 AM
Proof of innocence is an incredibly high bar, and one that didn't used to be a requirement for Americans.
All that is gold does not glitter,
Not all those who wander are lost;
The old that is strong does not wither,
Deep roots are not reached by the frost.

Longdan

#8
April 16, 2013, 02:38:02 PM
Back in the Good Olde Dayes
digni enim sunt interdicunt

LongBlade

#9
April 16, 2013, 04:32:13 PM
Quote from: Longdan on April 16, 2013, 02:38:02 PM
Back in the Good Olde Dayes

The good news is that if they toss me in the water I'll sink. But at least it'll prove me innocent.
All that is gold does not glitter,
Not all those who wander are lost;
The old that is strong does not wither,
Deep roots are not reached by the frost.

Mr. Bigglesworth

#10
April 16, 2013, 05:32:17 PM
Quote from: LongBlade on April 16, 2013, 08:12:05 AM
Proof of innocence is an incredibly high bar, and one that didn't used to be a requirement for Americans.

Is there such a thing? You cannot prove a negative. There is no proof associated with something that didn't happen.
"Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more; "
- Shakespeare's Henry V, Act III, 1598

LongBlade

#11
April 16, 2013, 08:31:28 PM
Quote from: Mr. Bigglesworth on April 16, 2013, 05:32:17 PM
Quote from: LongBlade on April 16, 2013, 08:12:05 AM
Proof of innocence is an incredibly high bar, and one that didn't used to be a requirement for Americans.

Is there such a thing? You cannot prove a negative. There is no proof associated with something that didn't happen.

Precisely. That's what's wrong with the current system of looting everyone's electronic data.

What's really confusing is how this is justified. The 4th amendment is quite easy to read and understand. And yet...lacking any good reason, the data continues to be accumulated. It's a colossal waste of time and money. The shame is that there are probably good, honest people being assigned to look at these phony theories. They want to believe the people telling them to investigate that their time is being put to good use. What a shame.
All that is gold does not glitter,
Not all those who wander are lost;
The old that is strong does not wither,
Deep roots are not reached by the frost.

GDS_Starfury

#12
April 16, 2013, 08:53:49 PM
Ill put good money on the idea that theyre actually watching porn and playing angry birds.
Jarhead - Yeah. You're probably right.

Gus - I use sweatpants with flannel shorts to soak up my crotch sweat.

Banzai Cat - There is no "partial credit" in grammar. Like anal sex. It's either in, or it's not.

Mirth - We learned long ago that they key isn't to outrun Star, it's to outrun Gus.

Martok - I don't know if it's possible to have an "anti-boner"...but I now have one.

Gus - Celery is vile and has no reason to exist. Like underwear on Star.

Longdan

#13
April 16, 2013, 10:54:45 PM
Quote from: GDS_Starfury on April 16, 2013, 08:53:49 PM
Ill put good money on the idea that theyre actually watching porn and playing angry birds.
^^Only the management types... since their job is making sure the "operational" types do not do that.
Where I worked security breaches only occurred at the highest levels since they wasted zillions making
sure the working folk couldn't breach anything.  The high level folk were the only ones who had time
and clearance to access animal porn and "Crush the Castle" (which is much better than angry tirds).
digni enim sunt interdicunt

GDS_Starfury

#14
April 16, 2013, 10:56:44 PM
Quote from: Longdan on April 16, 2013, 10:54:45 PM
Only the management types... since their job is making sure the "operational" types do not do that.
Where I worked security breaches only occurred at the highest levels since they wasted zillions making
sure the working folk couldn't breach anything.  The high level folk were the only ones who had time
and clearance to access animal porn and "Crush the Castle" (which is much better than angry tirds).

Canadistanian military procurment explained.
Jarhead - Yeah. You're probably right.

Gus - I use sweatpants with flannel shorts to soak up my crotch sweat.

Banzai Cat - There is no "partial credit" in grammar. Like anal sex. It's either in, or it's not.

Mirth - We learned long ago that they key isn't to outrun Star, it's to outrun Gus.

Martok - I don't know if it's possible to have an "anti-boner"...but I now have one.

Gus - Celery is vile and has no reason to exist. Like underwear on Star.

Print
Go Up Pages1 2
User actions