Multiplayer: Not ok to be ok?

[MengJiao]

ArmA III!

ARMA III! 

[FlickJax]

Cod UO or COD 2 :)

[Toonces]

I've found Red Orchestra 2/Rising Storm has a bit less of the rif-raff than other multiplayer games.

Also, if you wanted to do strictly Grogs, War of the Roses or Chivalry would be fun games.  I can't recommend either of those to play with random people, though, unless you have a high tolerance for buffoonery.

[undercovergeek]

I've found Red Orchestra 2/Rising Storm has a bit less of the rif-raff than other multiplayer games.

Also, if you wanted to do strictly Grogs, War of the Roses or Chivalry would be fun games.  I can't recommend either of those to play with random people, though, unless you have a high tolerance for buffoonery.

I think all of us on the same server armed with swords and morning stars has a pretty high buffoonery potential

[Gusington]

We are the riff-raff of buffoonery. Or vice versa. I forget.

[republic]

Arma III or Red Orchestra 2/Rising Sun

Though I'll play whatever ends up being the consensus.  The only series I really don't care for is Call of Duty, but I'd play whatever just to have some good folks to play with.

[Kushan]

We are the riff-raff of buffoonery. Or vice versa. I forget.

Can we be both at the same time?

Chose BF4 only because my record for survival in ArmA II/III is counted in seconds instead of minutes or hours.

[Gusington]

Yes!*

*maybe

[Nefaro]

I've found Red Orchestra 2/Rising Storm has a bit less of the rif-raff than other multiplayer games.

I would probably vote Rising Storm but I think we'd need quite a few more people than we have.  Aren't the typical server pops around forty or fifty?  I suppose leaving it as an open public server is the idea, though, right?

Otherwise I voted ARMA II even though I've got the whole collection and never fired it up.  It may well give me motion sickness as some other first-person shooters do  :( (RO2/Rising Storm does not).

[-budd-]

I voted TF2. I kinda miss the late night team fragging sessions. I started with Quake[on dialup, hard to play well with a 500 ping] moved to   TFC and played that for years on a few fun and well run servers where teamwork actually happened. Did the clan thing a couple of times but that just seemed to serious. If  I had to chose another game I'd say DOD:S , played the original for a few years and had fun with the WW2 team setting. I used to play some COD with the kids but who the hell can play with a gamepad when your a mouse guy :D besides i like to play where there's teamwork envolved and i never saw any playing COD with the kids.

[Staggerwing]

I voted ARMA2 because my box won't play ARMA3 and the only other game besides 'Other' that I've played is L4D2.

[Bison]

Server prices are based primarily on two factors.  The number of player slots and the game.  A voice client adds an additional cost.  We talked about this at some length last summer, but I think in the end there are a lot of guys who would like to play but the coordination across time zones, dates, and limiting it to one game proved nigh impossible.  It's why steam server based games have worked well for different groups in the past.  Namely CIV V, Warlock, and L4D2 groups that were meeting fairly regularly for awhile.

[GDS_Starfury]

Arma with the zombie mod.

[republic]

I went with Natural Selection 2.  Such a fantastic combo of strategy vs FPS fun.

[WYBaugh]

I picked up BF4 and I must have the uni with the huge bullseye since all I do is die.  I will find myself amassing points from capturing flags but will end up with 3 kills and 20 deaths.  I'm the new class...pacifist!

Not sure if it's my age, lack of upgrades compared to others or just out and out sucking but it does get very frustrating.  I've enjoyed playing for the most part but I need to find a way to improve my game.