I could live with this
https://www.yahoo.com/movies/proof-that-chris-pratt-is-perfect-for-indiana-109343233137.html
Almost anything is better than turning the franchise over to Shia LaBoeuf
Agree.
Agreed. Say no to Shia.
On the other hand, Chris Pratt would be a great choice.
or they could leave it alone and do something original. ::)
Quote from: GDS_Starfury on January 28, 2015, 10:54:50 PM
or they could leave it alone and do something original. ::)
Disney didn't pay $4 Billion for Lucasfilm to leave it's second most important franchise alone.
The time to leave it alone was before doing Kingdom of the Crystal Skulls.
I found that entertaining.
Quote from: GDS_Starfury on January 28, 2015, 11:24:51 PM
I found that entertaining.
Why do you think I brought it up?
Totally on board with Chris Pratt doing this role. Shia needs to go wither away and die somewhere out of the spotlight.
I for one support my fellow Pratt overlord. >:D
Quote from: Banzai_Cat on January 29, 2015, 09:21:59 AM
Shia needs to go wither away and die somewhere out of the spotlight.
Lately that seems like his plan.
Quote from: GDS_Starfury on January 28, 2015, 10:54:50 PM
or they could leave it alone and do something original. ::)
I'd really rather they do this.
However, if they're going to reboot the franchise, then Pratt would be a great choice to play the title role.
How much do you want to bet that Disney reboots the story back to 1899 and makes it all steampunky?
What if Michael Bay directs it?
(shudder)
I was wondering if they would do like Ghostbusters and have an all female cast. Malibu Jones and the Temple of Tampax. Could work. ::)
Sir Slash, you've been behind on your misogynistic commentary. I think this brings you current with the rest of us goons. :)
Glad to be back with the pack Banzai. Sorry I was slacking there for a bit.
Quote from: Staggerwing on February 04, 2015, 06:34:09 AM
How much do you want to bet that Disney reboots the story back to 1899 and makes it all steampunky?
And this would be wrong how?
Quote from: JasonPratt on February 04, 2015, 03:58:47 PM
Quote from: Staggerwing on February 04, 2015, 06:34:09 AM
How much do you want to bet that Disney reboots the story back to 1899 and makes it all steampunky?
And this would be wrong how?
Wrong was never implied, just Disney being Disney. It will be up to the writers, actors, and director as to how enjoyable the film(s) will be. The difference between a hack director and a great director is what they end up doing with the same box of generic cake mix that the studio allows each of them to work with.