GrogHeads Forum

Digital Gaming => Computer Gaming => Topic started by: Sir Slash on April 23, 2013, 06:14:32 PM

Title: Rome 2 TW video
Post by: Sir Slash on April 23, 2013, 06:14:32 PM
Don't know if this has already been posted here or not. Teutoberg Forest walk-through video. 10 Min. tease of Rome 2 TW. Looks and sounds great to me. Find it here... twcenter.net  Enjoy.
Title: Re: Rome 2 TW video
Post by: Grim.Reaper on April 23, 2013, 06:25:58 PM
Link?
Title: Re: Rome 2 TW video
Post by: TheCommandTent on April 23, 2013, 06:48:55 PM
I think this might be it.


Title: Re: Rome 2 TW video
Post by: mikeck on April 23, 2013, 07:09:27 PM
Looks great, but for the love of Pete, why most all total war units move like they're in a Benny Hill skit?
Title: Re: Rome 2 TW video
Post by: Silent Disapproval Robot on April 23, 2013, 07:25:29 PM
Focus testing for previous titles.  I remember reading an article from one of the devs and he stated that most of the players in the test groups complained that the units moved too slowly and the battles took too long so they upped the movement speed, cut the armour, and made morale much more fragile.  Gotta appease the twitch crowd.
Title: Re: Rome 2 TW video
Post by: Gusington on April 23, 2013, 07:46:08 PM
Hard not to like that video...and war hounds...YES!

(https://www.grogheads.com/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ft1.gstatic.com%2Fimages%3Fq%3Dtbn%3AANd9GcQF9j-JIoOW84dUGNviL9B-SVff7jNWPeuRslHsZ4Gkj7IZdN4E&hash=943ab9ea1ebbf9357bd79a694d8282bfa712d8ca)
Title: Re: Rome 2 TW video
Post by: Bison on April 23, 2013, 07:51:59 PM
I'm in love. 
Title: Re: Rome 2 TW video
Post by: Gusington on April 23, 2013, 07:55:56 PM
Yeah my dog is pretty awesome isn't he?
Title: Re: Rome 2 TW video
Post by: mikeck on April 23, 2013, 08:01:04 PM
Quote from: Silent Disapproval Robot on April 23, 2013, 07:25:29 PM
Focus testing for previous titles.  I remember reading an article from one of the devs and he stated that most of the players in the test groups complained that the units moved too slowly and the battles took too long so they upped the movement speed, cut the armour, and made morale much more fragile.  Gotta appease the twitch crowd.

Who the hell plays a vanilla TW game and thinks the units move to slow and battles last too long?...good lord. What, are they putting 6 year olds who are off of their Ritalin on these focus groups?
Title: Re: Rome 2 TW video
Post by: DeathTouchWilly on April 23, 2013, 08:01:43 PM
The fire effects are pretty awesome. Overall a decent vid.

Frankly I'm more interested in the campaign map and how those dynamics work. The battles may look more visually impressive but the reason I think RTW was so brilliant was because of the campaign. I've played through plenty of campaigns while glossing over the vast majority of the tactical battles (auto-resolve). Depending on the difficulty it can make things pretty challenging but I was so captivated by the strategic layer that I prefer focusing on that to spending 15 minutes of my very limited gaming time positioning phalanxes (as fun as it may be).
Title: Re: Rome 2 TW video
Post by: TheCommandTent on April 23, 2013, 08:11:57 PM
I really love all the work they have put into the battle maps and terrain.  They look amazing.  I also like the zoomed out tactical map.  It will be interesting to see how the influences play.
Title: Re: Rome 2 TW video
Post by: Silent Disapproval Robot on April 23, 2013, 08:46:08 PM
Quote from: mikeck on April 23, 2013, 08:01:04 PM
Quote from: Silent Disapproval Robot on April 23, 2013, 07:25:29 PM
Focus testing for previous titles.  I remember reading an article from one of the devs and he stated that most of the players in the test groups complained that the units moved too slowly and the battles took too long so they upped the movement speed, cut the armour, and made morale much more fragile.  Gotta appease the twitch crowd.

Who the hell plays a vanilla TW game and thinks the units move to slow and battles last too long?...good lord. What, are they putting 6 year olds who are off of their Ritalin on these focus groups?

Probably.  I remember well the stink during the run up to the release of E:TW when a dev announced that ships would be able to sail directly into the wind because focus testers found the concept of wind and direction of sail difficult to grasp.
Title: Re: Rome 2 TW video
Post by: Gusington on April 23, 2013, 09:41:03 PM
I remember that too. Not fondly.
Title: Re: Rome 2 TW video
Post by: Sir Slash on April 23, 2013, 09:57:20 PM
I miss the Flaming Pigs. I was impressed by the sound of the Roman soldiers running together. Sounded very realistic.
Title: Re: Rome 2 TW video
Post by: Nefaro on April 23, 2013, 10:18:34 PM
Quote from: mikeck on April 23, 2013, 08:01:04 PM
Quote from: Silent Disapproval Robot on April 23, 2013, 07:25:29 PM
Focus testing for previous titles.  I remember reading an article from one of the devs and he stated that most of the players in the test groups complained that the units moved too slowly and the battles took too long so they upped the movement speed, cut the armour, and made morale much more fragile.  Gotta appease the twitch crowd.

Who the hell plays a vanilla TW game and thinks the units move to slow and battles last too long?...good lord. What, are they putting 6 year olds who are off of their Ritalin on these focus groups?

Answer:

The RTS 'Zerg' crowd.

TW certainly has some crossover RTS customers, otherwise it wouldn't rake in what are obviously large sales numbers.
Title: Re: Rome 2 TW video
Post by: Martok on April 25, 2013, 06:52:47 AM
Visually impressive as always, although the Romans' fatigue -- specifically, the lack thereof -- struck me as a tad unrealistic.  Yes, the units still move too quickly as usual, but no surprise there. 




Quote from: DeathTouchWilly on April 23, 2013, 08:01:43 PM
Frankly I'm more interested in the campaign map and how those dynamics work. The battles may look more visually impressive but the reason I think RTW was so brilliant was because of the campaign. I've played through plenty of campaigns while glossing over the vast majority of the tactical battles (auto-resolve). Depending on the difficulty it can make things pretty challenging but I was so captivated by the strategic layer that I prefer focusing on that to spending 15 minutes of my very limited gaming time positioning phalanxes (as fun as it may be).
The non-existent AI and lack of immersion in RTW completely ruined any enjoyment I might have derived from the campaign (to say nothing of the battles themselves - ugh). 

I'm with you, however, in being more interested in Rome 2's campaign & gameplay mechanics.  Get that right, plus a decent AI (ala Shogun 2), and I'll be more than content.