GrogHeads Forum

IRL (In Real Life) => Current Events => Topic started by: LongBlade on March 05, 2012, 04:42:18 PM

Title: MD Gun Law Overturned
Post by: LongBlade on March 05, 2012, 04:42:18 PM
This may bring a smile to a few faces.

QuoteMaryland residents do not have to provide a "good and substantial reason" to legally own a handgun, a federal judge ruled Monday, striking down as unconstitutional the state's requirements for getting a permit.

U.S. District Judge Benson Everett Legg wrote that states are allowed some leeway in deciding the way residents exercise their Second Amendment right to bear arms, but Maryland's objective was to limit the number of firearms that individuals could carry, effectively creating a rationing system that rewarded those who provided the right answer for wanting  to own a gun.

Source: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/03/05/federal-judge-rules-maryland-gun-permit-law-unconstitutional/#ixzz1oHUKvieB
Title: Re: MD Gun Law Overturned
Post by: Jarhead0331 on March 05, 2012, 04:50:40 PM
(https://www.grogheads.com/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-ehaBtLKS4ok%2FToBvk5MO6lI%2FAAAAAAAALkI%2Fq8AUESvhFxg%2Fs1600%2FMonday%2BMorning%2BSmile%2B-%2Bkitten%2B-%2BTheLaughing%2BPet.jpg&hash=cf55c6d0e567d02a08038dc190831c0c5c08e6a5)
Title: Re: MD Gun Law Overturned
Post by: LongBlade on March 05, 2012, 05:31:55 PM
You need to shave, you big pussy.
Title: Re: MD Gun Law Overturned
Post by: son_of_montfort on March 05, 2012, 05:39:59 PM
I thought Second Amendment rights were being consistently eroded...  ;)
Title: Re: MD Gun Law Overturned
Post by: Steelgrave on March 05, 2012, 05:42:17 PM
Quote from: son_of_montfort on March 05, 2012, 05:39:59 PM
I thought Second Amendment rights were being consistently eroded...  ;)

Obviously they are, which is why this ended up in court and got overturned  ;)
Title: Re: MD Gun Law Overturned
Post by: Martok on March 05, 2012, 06:13:50 PM
Quote from: LongBlade on March 05, 2012, 04:42:18 PM
This may bring a smile to a few faces.

QuoteMaryland residents do not have to provide a "good and substantial reason" to legally own a handgun, a federal judge ruled Monday, striking down as unconstitutional the state's requirements for getting a permit.

U.S. District Judge Benson Everett Legg wrote that states are allowed some leeway in deciding the way residents exercise their Second Amendment right to bear arms, but Maryland's objective was to limit the number of firearms that individuals could carry, effectively creating a rationing system that rewarded those who provided the right answer for wanting  to own a gun.

Source: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/03/05/federal-judge-rules-maryland-gun-permit-law-unconstitutional/#ixzz1oHUKvieB
While I'm not a gun enthusiast myself, I can't say this ruling makes me sad.  Maryland's law makes me think of China's "guilty until proven innocent" justice system. 

Title: Re: MD Gun Law Overturned
Post by: Smuckatelli on March 05, 2012, 06:19:47 PM
Quote from: son_of_montfort on March 05, 2012, 05:39:59 PM
I thought Second Amendment rights were being consistently eroded...  ;)

Same thought occurred when D.C. was overturned. It was a good ruling but the local governemnt made it almost impossible to get a gun.

I'd like to look at this in about 6 months and see if MD is actually in line with the ruling or if they will just add so many layers of 'requirements'.
Title: Re: MD Gun Law Overturned
Post by: LongBlade on March 05, 2012, 09:33:44 PM
Quote from: Smuckatelli on March 05, 2012, 06:19:47 PM
Quote from: son_of_montfort on March 05, 2012, 05:39:59 PM
I thought Second Amendment rights were being consistently eroded...  ;)

Same thought occurred when D.C. was overturned. It was a good ruling but the local governemnt made it almost impossible to get a gun.

I'd like to look at this in about 6 months and see if MD is actually in line with the ruling or if they will just add so many layers of 'requirements'.

While this is a good ruling, I'm curious about the other part - where the judge said it is appropriate for localities to make *some* rules regarding ownership. I wonder how that falls out?