I do this exercise in class with my students when we talk about news media
I thought it might be interesting to do here
QuoteYou are the newspaper editor / TV news producer.
The date is 22 January, 1998. Among the news highlights you're expecting for the day are:
- The Pope is in Cuba for a sit-down with Fidel Castro.
- It's the 25th anniversary of Roe v Wade, and there are massive protests expected on both sides in DC.
- Space Shuttle Endeavor takes off, headed to Russian Space Station Mir.
- Ted Kaczynski (the Unabomber) pleads guilty to all counts.
- 1-year anniversary of Madeleine Albright's tenure as first female Secretary of State
- UN / NATO discussions on Yugoslavian oppression in Kosovo during run-up to eventual bombing / occupation
What is the lead story on your newscast / front page, and why?
•It's the 25th anniversary of Roe v Wade, and there are massive protests expected on both sides in DC.
Because it's probably had single biggest impact on US society since WWII. Whether for or against people from all walks of life have been affected by it.
.
Bill Clinton not keeping his cigar in his pocket with Monica
eyebiter - you're googling too much :)
If I were a news producer in 1998 (or now for that matter), I'd know that there are fewer topics that raise the hackles of the Left and Right in the USA as Roe vs Wade, so that'd be my lead off story. To further appease the Left and the Feminists, I'd follow with Madeleine Albright's tenure as first female Secretary of State. Next, I'd cover the UN / NATO discussions. The Unabomber would be old news by then, same for the space shuttle so I'd cover those later in the newscast and I'd probably only mention the Pope at the end of the news (if I had time) as a warm-fuzzy piece...
Roe vs. Wade protests. For two reasons:
1) On a personal level, I think it's important that a woman has a choice. I wish that the clinics they use would go a fair way towards trying to convince the female not to abort. In the end, the womans choice.
and
2) Conflict sells papers/gets people watching. "25 years ago today, baby killers were unleashed on the nation!"
I didn't read anyone else's post before posting mine. I like all your answers, but I like eyebiter's the best.
I would really have hoped that it would be the Shuttle going to the space station. For the reason that, if that is the lead story, then we are devoting serious attention to space. We need a goal to unite mankind. Working towards using the resources around us and adapting our way of life for living off planet. And if we live long enough, moving off this planet is the only way for the human race to survive.
Quote from: bayonetbrant on April 03, 2014, 10:35:48 AM
I do this exercise in class with my students when we talk about news media
I thought it might be interesting to do here
QuoteYou are the newspaper editor / TV news producer.
The date is 22 January, 1998. Among the news highlights you're expecting for the day are:
- The Pope is in Cuba for a sit-down with Fidel Castro.
- It's the 25th anniversary of Roe v Wade, and there are massive protests expected on both sides in DC.
- Space Shuttle Endeavor takes off, headed to Russian Space Station Mir.
- Ted Kaczynski (the Unabomber) pleads guilty to all counts.
- 1-year anniversary of Madeleine Albright's tenure as first female Secretary of State
- UN / NATO discussions on Yugoslavian oppression in Kosovo during run-up to eventual bombing / occupation
What is the lead story on your newscast / front page, and why?
UN / NATO discussions on Yugoslavian oppression in Kosovo during run-up to eventual bombing / occupation
Why? It is the item that has the most meaning going forward. Initially I thought RvsW like Bearthheart then I thought everyone has had plenty of time to form a position. So even though the last item is 'foreign' news, it is the most likely to put the country into new decisions in the future. People need time to cogitate over that.
One more thing, the press should feel they have a civic duty to make people engaged citizens. Engaged citizens are less likely to have the wool pulled over their eyes. Several items are trivia. Who cares. Geopolitical events have far reaching consequences that impact far into the future.
QuoteYou are the newspaper editor / TV news producer.
the correct answer is: of what kind of news paper or TV station and its HQ where on the globe ?
(serious, financial, or yellow press, leaning left or right, focus is local, regional, global?)
How his the audience structured?
What do they expect from 'their' news?
Where there dead people (and how many of them American ...if none, it only count a hundredth part, if ever inside US)?
Are there 'emotions' that can be exaggerated and feasted on by interview victims, mourning, injured on the spot?
btw..we still need another cute animal puppy or bird vid for the end ...let the intern check latest YT
What do the companies who buy regularly the add blocks 'tolerate' and want to see around their adds?
Is there a (silent)owner of the newpaper or the tv-station, does he/she/the board of directors got a pet peeve,
a NoGo, a sweet spot, a show stopper,...
the actual "news" doesn't matter at all... do you want bread on the table or the f*#&ing Pulitzer prize ;)
Quote from: Mr. Bigglesworth on April 03, 2014, 09:36:01 PM
One more thing, the press should feel they have a civic duty to make people engaged citizens. Engaged citizens are less likely to have the wool pulled over their eyes. Several items are trivia. Who cares. Geopolitical events have far reaching consequences that impact far into the future.
But that only applies if citizens WANT to be engaged, and we don't want to be. The news is offering exactly what the viewing audience is demanding... absolutely nothing challenging, and a bunch of fluff.
It's a trick question you a bunch of dorks. Every news station ran with the lead of Bill Clinton doing the nasty things with Monica.
Quote from: Arctic Blast on April 04, 2014, 10:31:13 PM
Quote from: Mr. Bigglesworth on April 03, 2014, 09:36:01 PM
One more thing, the press should feel they have a civic duty to make people engaged citizens. Engaged citizens are less likely to have the wool pulled over their eyes. Several items are trivia. Who cares. Geopolitical events have far reaching consequences that impact far into the future.
But that only applies if citizens WANT to be engaged, and we don't want to be. The news is offering exactly what the viewing audience is demanding... absolutely nothing challenging, and a bunch of fluff.
Don't watch news for your fluff, there is sports, sitcoms, all kinds of stuff.
Quote from: Windigo on April 04, 2014, 11:37:35 PM
It's a trick question you a bunch of dorks. Every news station ran with the lead of Bill Clinton doing the nasty things with Monica.
Pretty much. And they were all reporting it live from Havana b/c they were there for the Pope's visit in Cuba
If I'm a local news organization, I will smother the airwaves with stories of crime, break-ins, assaults, and beatings, but will not help the community in any way by releasing any details about what the perps look like, so we don't offend anyone. In the midst of that I will have a story about cute little dogs at the pound that need adoption and something inane about a shoe sale nearby, because women be all about shoes. If there's time then something international. Usually there will not be time. Also, if any of these stories can be split up with the "more info later in the broadcast" to keep people watching my advertiser's stupid commercials (because my station is a whore), so much the better.
If I were an editor/producer, I'd run compelling stories about how bacon and/or gravy improves lives in my community, and around the world. I'd feature all kinds of stuff with boobs, 'cause I like boobs. Also, yoga pants.
Quote from: Mr. Bigglesworth on April 05, 2014, 12:02:06 AM
Quote from: Arctic Blast on April 04, 2014, 10:31:13 PM
Quote from: Mr. Bigglesworth on April 03, 2014, 09:36:01 PM
One more thing, the press should feel they have a civic duty to make people engaged citizens. Engaged citizens are less likely to have the wool pulled over their eyes. Several items are trivia. Who cares. Geopolitical events have far reaching consequences that impact far into the future.
But that only applies if citizens WANT to be engaged, and we don't want to be. The news is offering exactly what the viewing audience is demanding... absolutely nothing challenging, and a bunch of fluff.
Don't watch news for your fluff, there is sports, sitcoms, all kinds of stuff.
Again, the news (like everything else on network TV) is providing exactly what the people are demanding. Getting upset because the news is using up airtime on Entertainment segments and the like is just as misguided as complaining that major game publishers keep putting out shooters...they're providing what pays the bills.
I cancelled cable many years ago. With few exceptions, it is useless.
Quote from: Arctic Blast on April 05, 2014, 08:52:18 PM
Quote from: Mr. Bigglesworth on April 05, 2014, 12:02:06 AM
Quote from: Arctic Blast on April 04, 2014, 10:31:13 PM
Quote from: Mr. Bigglesworth on April 03, 2014, 09:36:01 PM
One more thing, the press should feel they have a civic duty to make people engaged citizens. Engaged citizens are less likely to have the wool pulled over their eyes. Several items are trivia. Who cares. Geopolitical events have far reaching consequences that impact far into the future.
But that only applies if citizens WANT to be engaged, and we don't want to be. The news is offering exactly what the viewing audience is demanding... absolutely nothing challenging, and a bunch of fluff.
Don't watch news for your fluff, there is sports, sitcoms, all kinds of stuff.
Again, the news (like everything else on network TV) is providing exactly what the people are demanding. Getting upset because the news is using up airtime on Entertainment segments and the like is just as misguided as complaining that major game publishers keep putting out shooters...they're providing what pays the bills.
That's why they've got to re-instate broadcast standards as a prerequisite of getting a broadcast licence. Bringing back things like being required to broadcast a certain number of hours devoted to news, education, and children's programming as a licencing requirement would be a good start. That removed the profit motive so that the news is no longer pandering for ratings to sell ad time and instead becomes a prestige position where networks compete to have the best team for the gathering and dissemination of substantive news.
Quote from: Mr. Bigglesworth on April 06, 2014, 08:38:59 AM
I cancelled cable many years ago. With few exceptions, it is useless.
Oh, I pretty much completely agree.