US Ambassador to Libya and 3 staff members killed

Started by Bison, September 11, 2012, 02:38:12 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

OJsDad

Quote from: bayonetbrant on November 01, 2012, 08:49:48 PM
Quote from: OJsDad on November 01, 2012, 07:32:40 PMI'm hearing that a US General is retiring because he wanted to send in a rapid response team in, and was ready to ignore DC when he was relieved. 

That one's crap - it's people who don't like the President trying to draw conclusions that don't exist.  If they were firing the guy b/c of a disagreement like that, he would be relieved, not having a successor nominated that's at least a year from Senate confirmation.

I think the real reason that Rodriguez was already nominated as Ham's replacement is that he's rotating out of Afghanistan soon and they need somewhere to put him, and no other billets are close to open.  Ham isn't one of the bright shining stars who is going anywhere else, so why not retire him a year early?

Of course, if you fired Ham, you would have to answer questions as to why. 
'Here at NASA we all pee the same color.'  Al Harrison from the movie Hidden Figures.

Bison

The "move" is pretty coincidental to say the least.

bayonetbrant

Quote from: bayonetbrant on November 01, 2012, 08:49:48 PMI think the real reason that Rodriguez was already nominated as Ham's replacement is that he's rotating out of Afghanistan soon and they need somewhere to put him, and no other billets are close to open.  Ham isn't one of the bright shining stars who is going anywhere else, so why not retire him a year early?

Quote from: OJsDad on November 01, 2012, 07:32:40 PMI'm hearing that a US General is retiring because he wanted to send in a rapid response team in, and was ready to ignore DC when he was relieved. 
Quote from: Bison on November 03, 2012, 07:33:58 PMThe "move" is pretty coincidental to say the least.

One of these days, y'all will start listening to me... 

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/nov/7/head-of-africa-command-not-forced-out/

QuoteThe real story of Gen. Ham's retirement is linked to the career of Gen. David M. Rodriguez, one of the Army's top field commanders. He now heads Army Forces Command, a non-war-fighting job that ensures the readiness of 820,000 soldiers.
Forces command is not among the most prized assignments for a war fighter. The most coveted posts sought by the four military branches, outside the Joint Chiefs of Staff, are the geographic combatant commands.
The four-star commanders fight the nation's wars. None is more prominent than the chief of the U.S. Central Command, which led the war in Iraq and is overseeing Afghanistan. That war has its own four-star, Marine CorpsGen. John R. Allen, in a post that has all the prestige of a combatant commander.
The story begins when the Obama administration decided to cut Gen. Allen's tour short and move him to Brussels next spring as the top NATO commander and the chief of U.S. European Command.
Internally, the Army top brass lobbied to replace Gen. Allen with Gen. Rodriguez. He held a senior command in Afghanistan last year and has the in-country know-how to carry out President Obama's decision to methodically withdraw U.S. forces by the end of 2014. The Pentagon has pulled out 33,000 "surge" forces this year, leaving about 68,000 troops.
To the Army's chagrin, the defense secretary and the White House opted for another Marine, Gen. Joseph F. Dunford Jr., whom Mr. Obama installed as the assistant Marine Corps commandant in 2010.
"The Army wanted that command," the military source said. "They are putting someone in that command who has no Afghanistan experience versus Rodriguez who has considerable."
Gen. Dunford had extensive combat experience in Iraq.
In a sort of compromise, Mr. Panetta found a prestigious combatant command for Gen. Rodriguez. The one that was opening up next year was Africa Command, which has grown in importance with the emergence of al-Qaeda-like Islamic terrorist groups in North Africa.
"Joint commands have a much higher status than an in-service four-star command," the military source said. "He's a combatant commander in an operational command with the potential to go to war. Those are the most desirable positions. They are the most sought-after."
The defense secretary announced the change in mid-October amid the Washington brouhaha over Benghazi, triggering the Internet guessing about Gen. Ham. The Pentagon said Gen. Ham's retirement had nothing to do with Benghazi.
Combatant commanders typically serve two-year terms, sometimes three years, then retire or transfer. Gen. Ham's 24-months comes due in March, so he may leave a month or two early after Gen. Rodriguez is confirmed by the Senate.
The key to surviving this site is to not say something which ends up as someone's tag line - Steelgrave

"their citizens (all of them counted as such) glorified their mythology of 'rights'...and lost track of their duties. No nation, so constituted, can endure." Robert Heinlein, Starship Troopers