Access to your pr0n is safe, for now

[mirth]

I'll be bitchy all week.

[bayonetbrant]

I'll be bitchy all week.

that cute how you can sum up the past 8 years in one pithy little sentence ;)

[mirth]

that cute how you can sum up the past 8 years in one pithy little sentence ;)

Apostrophe s isn't your strong suit is it?

Heil Grammar!

[bayonetbrant]

me speak neanderthal to understood here

[mirth]

you make good with word

[mirth]

This has been a fun debate, but let's remember the really important things

[LongBlade]

Thank you. There were far too many words on the last page.

[Bison]

The hysteria around the issue is astounding:

https://www.techdirt.com/blog/netneutrality/articles/20150302/08162630183/hysterical-facts-optional-assault-fccs-new-neutrality-rules-has-commenced.shtml

If the Republican Party wants to tow the line for big telecom, it may be time for me to start voting Democrat. Never thought I would think that again.

I think there is something to be said that the vote was along party lines.  My issue in not with the "theory".  My issue is that the camel's nose is in the tent.  And because the internet is no longer considered an information service, but a telecommunication system there in lies a huge opening for additional regulation for problems that do not exist or are marginal at best not to mention fees, charges, and taxes, and yes regulation of content.  Read your phone bill and you realize that there is a huge cost burden placed on telecommunication that does not exist on the internet today, but there is no question that similar charges will start to be accrued on your internet bill in the future.

[Bison]

It's all frankly pissing into the wind until the actual regulatory documentation is released.  It isn't.  So neither side of the issue actually knows anything about what was passed.

[mirth]

http://gizmodo.com/why-americas-internet-is-so-shitty-and-slow-1686173744