Order of Battle: Morning Sun

Started by JasonPratt, January 29, 2016, 01:37:56 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 2
User actions

berto

#15
February 04, 2016, 03:34:50 PM Last Edit: February 05, 2016, 03:59:54 AM by berto
Quote from: Crossroads on January 30, 2016, 02:22:46 AMThis boardgamegeek buys in the second they have the boardgame counters  :smitten:

For this boardgame geek, 2D with NATO counters is a necessary but not sufficient condition for me buying this game.  No 2D, NO SALE.
Campaign Series Legion https://cslegion.com
Campaign Series Lead Coder https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tt.asp?forumid=1515
Panzer Campaigns, Panzer Battles Lead Coder https://wargameds.com

jomni

#16
February 04, 2016, 07:48:02 PM
Quote from: DicedT on February 04, 2016, 12:04:19 PM
How does this differ from Panzer General?

More detailed supply rules. Matters a lot during those island invasions.

Boggit

#17
February 04, 2016, 07:57:07 PM
Quote from: jomni on February 04, 2016, 07:48:02 PM
Quote from: DicedT on February 04, 2016, 12:04:19 PM
How does this differ from Panzer General?

More detailed supply rules. Matters a lot during those island invasions.
+1. As Jomni says. There are other factors that are more advanced like the flanking rules for example. Think of it as a prettier, more advanced version of Pacific General. I've enjoyed the little I've played of it - about 7 scenarios.
The most shocking fact about war is that its victims and its instruments are individual human beings, and that these individual beings are condemned by the monstrous conventions of politics to murder or be murdered in quarrels not their own. Aldous Huxley

Foul Temptress! (Mirth replying to Gus) ;)

On a good day, our legislature has the prestige of a drunk urinating on a wall at 4am and getting most of it on his shoe. On a good day  ::) Steelgrave

It's kind of silly to investigate whether or not a Clinton is lying. That's sort of like investigating why the sky is blue. Banzai_Cat

Gusington

#18
February 04, 2016, 07:59:40 PM
Me too but he scripting...there should really be more than one way to win a scenario.
✡

слава Україна!

We can't live under the threat of a c*nt because he's threatening nuclear Armageddon.

-JudgeDredd

Boggit

#19
February 04, 2016, 08:12:17 PM
Quote from: Gusington on February 04, 2016, 07:59:40 PM
Me too but he scripting...there should really be more than one way to win a scenario.
Oh, I'm with you there. Scripting has its place, but as you say some flexibility as to how you win is always good.
The most shocking fact about war is that its victims and its instruments are individual human beings, and that these individual beings are condemned by the monstrous conventions of politics to murder or be murdered in quarrels not their own. Aldous Huxley

Foul Temptress! (Mirth replying to Gus) ;)

On a good day, our legislature has the prestige of a drunk urinating on a wall at 4am and getting most of it on his shoe. On a good day  ::) Steelgrave

It's kind of silly to investigate whether or not a Clinton is lying. That's sort of like investigating why the sky is blue. Banzai_Cat

Gusington

#20
February 04, 2016, 08:17:05 PM
Yeah at least two ways to win scenarios would be most welcome here and crack this game open.
✡

слава Україна!

We can't live under the threat of a c*nt because he's threatening nuclear Armageddon.

-JudgeDredd

jomni

#21
February 04, 2016, 08:17:43 PM
It's no better than Panzer General / Corps. Thight timelines too. But not as tight as Panzer General.

Gusington

#22
February 04, 2016, 08:23:43 PM
Yeah. Almost feels like a puzzle game, in a way.
✡

слава Україна!

We can't live under the threat of a c*nt because he's threatening nuclear Armageddon.

-JudgeDredd
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2
User actions