Is Andrew Greene the Wolf of Wallstreet?

Started by Boggit, June 19, 2016, 02:09:04 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Boggit

http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/leonardo-dicaprio-to-testify-in-wolf-of-wall-street-lawsuit-w210541

Admittedly, I don't know the full facts, but at first sight it appears to me to be a money grabbing vexatious lawsuit. It's not beyond the bounds of possibility that Andrew Greene sees himself in the character Nicky "Rugrat" Koskof, and dislikes what he saw. However, as far as I can tell, Greene was not mentioned in the script in any contentious, nor defamatory way. Moreover, most films, and I'd guess this one too have clauses on the credits disclaiming that the characters represent actual people, either alive or dead. With that in mind, it seems highly unlikely that any rational jury will find that the film was calculated to damage his reputation to third parties. Just my take on the article... you may see things differently.

http://thelawdictionary.org/article/how-do-you-prove-a-defamation-of-character-claim/
The most shocking fact about war is that its victims and its instruments are individual human beings, and that these individual beings are condemned by the monstrous conventions of politics to murder or be murdered in quarrels not their own. Aldous Huxley

Foul Temptress! (Mirth replying to Gus) ;)

On a good day, our legislature has the prestige of a drunk urinating on a wall at 4am and getting most of it on his shoe. On a good day  ::) Steelgrave

It's kind of silly to investigate whether or not a Clinton is lying. That's sort of like investigating why the sky is blue. Banzai_Cat

airboy

I read about this in the Wall St. Journal.  Generally, it is hard to prove defamation of character in the USA if you are a public figure or if the character is a composite of multiple people.  I don't think the movie makers have much to worry about.