DEC 2013 TS forum game archive

Started by GJK, November 26, 2013, 12:04:30 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

BanzaiCat

GJK - are we going to play Tournament rules where we have to reveal our 'held' card from turn to turn to each other? Or is that just going to stay secret?

GJK

We can take a vote on that if we decide to, otherwise, I would just say stick to the standard rules (for this game at least).
Clip your freaking corners!
----------------------
Blood Bowl on VASSAL - Ask me about it! http://garykrockover.com/BB/
----------------------
"Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son."

-Dean Vernon Wormer

BanzaiCat

Nah, not that important. I'm for keeping it basic.

Ubercat

We don't yet have Domination in Asia. Domination requires controlling more Battleground states than the opponent, AND at least 1 non-Battleground state. That's why we need to grab Afghanistan (or something else) along with as many BG states as we can.

We can probably go ahead and play Containment for Ops. (we currently can't space race more than 1 card a turn) We just have to make it one of our last card plays so the damage is minimized.

I've already given my vote for our next card play and it's the same as BC's. I'm going to look at the map and our remaining cards together and develop an opinion of of our optimal order for card plays this turn.
"If you have always believed that everyone should play by the same rules and be judged by the same standards, that would have gotten you labelled a radical 50 years ago, a liberal 25 years ago, and a racist today."

- Thomas Sowell

Ubercat

Yeah. Since we have a moderator there's definitely no need to show our hold cards. He knows we're all honest!
"If you have always believed that everyone should play by the same rules and be judged by the same standards, that would have gotten you labelled a radical 50 years ago, a liberal 25 years ago, and a racist today."

- Thomas Sowell

BanzaiCat

Quote from: Ubercat on December 06, 2013, 09:32:19 AM
We don't yet have Domination in Asia. Domination requires controlling more Battleground states than the opponent, AND at least 1 non-Battleground state. That's why we need to grab Afghanistan (or something else) along with as many BG states as we can.

Arg, I thought I might miss something. Thanks for the clarification.


Quote from: Ubercat
We can probably go ahead and play Containment for Ops. (we currently can't space race more than 1 card a turn) We just have to make it one of our last card plays so the damage is minimized.

At first I thought you were saying to play Containment for OPS this Action Round. I was about to say, Comrade...

And now that I see your point about Afghanistan, the next AR we could do a card for OPS and put some influence in Afghanistan and Lebanon for some quick Controls. And hope we get the Vietnam Revolts card soon to spread our wonderful influence through those weak SE Asia nations. 



Quote from: Ubercat
I've already given my vote for our next card play and it's the same as BC's. I'm going to look at the map and our remaining cards together and develop an opinion of of our optimal order for card plays this turn.

We'll just need Comrade Barthheartovich's input now, and then we can give GJK our move.

GJK

Yeah - the question should be whether or not I'm trustworthy.  Muah ha ha!!!!  I AM THE ALL SEEING EYE!
Clip your freaking corners!
----------------------
Blood Bowl on VASSAL - Ask me about it! http://garykrockover.com/BB/
----------------------
"Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son."

-Dean Vernon Wormer

skeptical.platypus

Quote from: GJK on December 06, 2013, 08:13:31 AM
Our outside fan base grows to one!  :)

Glad that you're enjoying following along platy.

I like your "Card/Event" context summaries, btw. It's a very nice touch!
The Law of Unintended Consequences, Seattle Pride Variant: The only city on the planet that can guarantee your purchase of recreational marijuana is from a stoner making $15/hr.

undercovergeek


bob48

I quite like the Vietnam Revolts card. It seems to me that it forces them to make actions in an area that we have decided not to include in our immediate plans (such as they are) and removes a red card from play. I may, of course, got that all tits-about-face!
'We few, we happy few, we band of brothers'

'Clip those corners'

Recombobulate the discombobulators!

undercovergeek

Quote from: bob48 on December 06, 2013, 02:23:03 PM
I quite like the Vietnam Revolts card. It seems to me that it forces them to make actions in an area that we have decided not to include in our immediate plans (such as they are) and removes a red card from play. I may, of course, got that all tits-about-face!

im good with that, lets play it as an event and get rid of it

bob48

'We few, we happy few, we band of brothers'

'Clip those corners'

Recombobulate the discombobulators!

Staggerwing

Vituð ér enn - eða hvat?  -Voluspa

Nothing really rocks and nothing really rolls and nothing's ever worth the cost...

"Don't you look at me that way..." -the Abyss
 
'When searching for a meaningful embrace, sometimes my self respect took second place' -Iggy Pop, Cry for Love

... this will go down on your permanent record... -the Violent Femmes, 'Kiss Off'-

"I'm not just anyone, I'm not just anyone-
I got my time machine, got my 'electronic dream!"
-Sonic Reducer, -Dead Boys


Staggerwing

LOL- I'm as much a babe in the woods as anyone here when it comes to this game so it all sounds good to me.  :D
Vituð ér enn - eða hvat?  -Voluspa

Nothing really rocks and nothing really rolls and nothing's ever worth the cost...

"Don't you look at me that way..." -the Abyss
 
'When searching for a meaningful embrace, sometimes my self respect took second place' -Iggy Pop, Cry for Love

... this will go down on your permanent record... -the Violent Femmes, 'Kiss Off'-

"I'm not just anyone, I'm not just anyone-
I got my time machine, got my 'electronic dream!"
-Sonic Reducer, -Dead Boys