T-34 myths

Started by Keunert, March 19, 2013, 10:37:25 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Keunert

i knew about some of these points, like optics and the tank commander having too many tasks. but i was not aware how bad the overall performance was, nor was i aware that most T-34 kills were made by 50mm guns, i actually believed that the 88 and the Stukas were important in fighting off the T-34. but numbers show that those were only marginally involved in fighting this tank. very interesting read:

http://operationbarbarossa.net/Myth-Busters/MythBusters2.html

There is also another article about the Pak 36, called the Panzer Anklopf Kanone (Door Knocker) by crews. in contrast to my beliefs these PAK's were quite effective at fighting russian armor.


Disclaimer: I am fully aware that Starfury mentioned all this on Wargamer, 17th of april 1996, again on 05th of may 1997 and so forth.
Consistency is the last refuge of the unimaginative.
Oscar Wilde

Special K has too much class.
Windigo

GDS_Starfury

actually its down in the tank thread.   8)
Jarhead - Yeah. You're probably right.

Gus - I use sweatpants with flannel shorts to soak up my crotch sweat.

Banzai Cat - There is no "partial credit" in grammar. Like anal sex. It's either in, or it's not.

Mirth - We learned long ago that they key isn't to outrun Star, it's to outrun Gus.

Martok - I don't know if it's possible to have an "anti-boner"...but I now have one.

Gus - Celery is vile and has no reason to exist. Like underwear on Star.


bob48

Am I right in saying that the first 3-man turret version was the T34/85?
'We few, we happy few, we band of brothers'

'Clip those corners'

Recombobulate the discombobulators!

Staggerwing

Vituð ér enn - eða hvat?  -Voluspa

Nothing really rocks and nothing really rolls and nothing's ever worth the cost...

"Don't you look at me that way..." -the Abyss
 
'When searching for a meaningful embrace, sometimes my self respect took second place' -Iggy Pop, Cry for Love

... this will go down on your permanent record... -the Violent Femmes, 'Kiss Off'-

"I'm not just anyone, I'm not just anyone-
I got my time machine, got my 'electronic dream!"
-Sonic Reducer, -Dead Boys

Silent Disapproval Robot

Not if your turret mates have just enjoyed a large helping of cabbage kapusta.

GDS_Starfury

IMHO the T-34 is a POS.  the hull and engine layout were great but the turret/comms/ammo storage sucked.  FWIW I think pretty much all operational Allied tanks were POS as well.  having said that all of those tanks followed their countires operational doctirne at the time so it was form follows funtion issue.  the functional idea was flawed.
Jarhead - Yeah. You're probably right.

Gus - I use sweatpants with flannel shorts to soak up my crotch sweat.

Banzai Cat - There is no "partial credit" in grammar. Like anal sex. It's either in, or it's not.

Mirth - We learned long ago that they key isn't to outrun Star, it's to outrun Gus.

Martok - I don't know if it's possible to have an "anti-boner"...but I now have one.

Gus - Celery is vile and has no reason to exist. Like underwear on Star.


Longdan

I guess you are a Japanese and Italian tank fanboy? Or another Panzer lover?
I dunno but a lot of people have had a lot praise for the T-34.
I never thought much past that.
I used to tell my kids: When buying a used car buy a model that you see a lot of on the road.
digni enim sunt interdicunt

endfire79

Early T-34's models and soviet tanks in general throughout the war suffered from poor layout that was very rough on the crewman.  Radio sets did not exist in early models IIRC, that kills communication (note French tanks had this same problem).

Didn't Ivans used to give M3 Lees/Grant's = coffin for 6 brothers distinction?  (reminds me of Longdan's comment about the song 'who left the lid off the nuclear reactor again') There appeared to be equal animosity towards each others early tanks at the time :) 

I'm curious to see what the Soviet observations on captured StugIII tanks turned out to be.   
"I will return before you can say 'antidisestablishmentarianism'."

"A man may fight for many things. His country, his principles, his friends. The glistening tear on the cheek of a golden child. But personally, I'd mud-wrestle my own mother for a ton of cash, an amusing clock and a sack of French porn."

GDS_Starfury

Quote from: Longdan on March 27, 2013, 11:03:43 AM
I guess you are a Japanese and Italian tank fanboy? Or another Panzer lover?
I dunno but a lot of people have had a lot praise for the T-34.
I never thought much past that.
I used to tell my kids: When buying a used car buy a model that you see a lot of on the road.

you might be interested to know that all modern non-Russian MBTs have followed the German pattern and not the Soviet.  crew layout, engine/trans layout, comms, optics etc.  I have not read one historical biography from a Soviet tanker that praised the T-34 so who are you talking about?  thats a direct question that I would like to hear the answer to.  neither stalins 'quantity has a quality of its own' remark nor a Soviet generals praise qualifies.
Jarhead - Yeah. You're probably right.

Gus - I use sweatpants with flannel shorts to soak up my crotch sweat.

Banzai Cat - There is no "partial credit" in grammar. Like anal sex. It's either in, or it's not.

Mirth - We learned long ago that they key isn't to outrun Star, it's to outrun Gus.

Martok - I don't know if it's possible to have an "anti-boner"...but I now have one.

Gus - Celery is vile and has no reason to exist. Like underwear on Star.


Longdan

^^Who pist in your cornflakes?  You do not get to demand answers.
I said I did not know but have been aware of many people saying the T34 was a good tank.
The controversy over which may have been the best tank of WW2 and after has been batted around for a long time all over.
I know who won the war and I don't care if you love panzers.  It is certainly your prerogative to do so if you want.
Like the much reviled Shermy people used them for a long time after the war.
The French used some Panthers after WW2 but when they wore out that was the end of that line.
digni enim sunt interdicunt

LongBlade

Quote from: Longdan on March 28, 2013, 06:00:28 PM
The French used some Panthers after WW2 but when they wore out that was the end of that line.

Might there be reasons other than merit to explain that?
All that is gold does not glitter,
Not all those who wander are lost;
The old that is strong does not wither,
Deep roots are not reached by the frost.

Longdan

Probably they were French and wanted them for loot since they had some thousands of Shermies
sitting around.  They had to be different I guess.  I do not know how many of the tanks the US army
left in Europe after the shooting stopped but I do know the Canadians handed all of their tanks
over to the Dutch and Belgians and the British left almost all of theirs on the continent in 1945/46.
digni enim sunt interdicunt