Birds - Poisonous

Started by solops, May 29, 2026, 11:39:25 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

solops

Why are there no poisonous birds?
"I could have conquered Europe, all of it, but I had women in my life." - King Henry II of England
Wine is sure proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy. - Benjamin Franklin
Bless those who heal our injuries.
Customer support by AI is evil.

JasonPratt

Kind of need teeth for that. Bony tails (like scorpions) would work I suppose, but might mess up their flight capabilities.

Then again, cockatrices and wyverns, yo!
ICEBREAKER THESIS CHRONOLOGY! -- Victor Suvorov's Stalin Grand Strategy theory, in lots and lots of chronological order...
Dawn of Armageddon -- narrative AAR for Dawn of War: Soulstorm: Ultimate Apocalypse
Survive Harder! -- Two season narrative AAR, an Amazon Blood Bowl career.
PanzOrc Corpz Generals -- Fantasy Wars narrative AAR, half a combined campaign.
Khazâd du-bekâr! -- narrative dwarf AAR for LotR BfME2 RotWK campaign.
RobO Q Campaign Generator -- archived classic CMBB/CMAK tool!

Jarhead0331

According to copilot, there are poisonous birds, but they are rare and they are not venomous.

QuoteContrary to the premise of your question, scientists have identified a small number of birds that are chemically toxic.

The best-known example is the hooded pitohui from Papua New Guinea.
Its skin and feathers contain batrachotoxin, a powerful neurotoxin that can cause numbness or tingling if touched.

Other examples include:

Blue-capped ifrit
European quail (occasionally toxic to eat)
Spur-winged goose

Overall, this is an exceptional trait among birds, not a common one.

Even though toxicity exists, it's unusual in birds compared to insects, amphibians, or reptiles. The reasons come down to evolutionary trade-offs:

(A) Birds already have extremely effective defenses
Birds evolved different survival strategies:

Flight (escape predators)
Speed and mobility
Sharp beaks/talons (in many species)

Because these strategies are effective, there's less evolutionary pressure to develop toxins.

(B) Toxins are metabolically costly
Producing or handling toxins is biologically expensive:

Requires specialized physiology
Requires resistance to self-poisoning

Many animals evolve toxins only when they need them (e.g., slow, vulnerable animals). Birds generally don't fall into that category.

(C) Most toxic birds don't make their own poison
A key limitation:

Known poisonous birds don't synthesize toxins themselves
They acquire them from diet (e.g., toxic beetles) [en.wikipedia.org]

That means:

The trait depends on ecology, not just genetics
It's harder to evolve widely across bird species

(D) Toxicity evolved only in a few isolated lineages
Research shows:

Toxicity in birds arose independently in small clusters
Many lineages may have gained and then lost it over time [en.wikipedia.org]

So it never became a widespread "successful" strategy in birds.

Grogheads Uber Alles
Semper Grog
"No beast is more alpha than JH." Gusington, 10/23/18